CBC reviews, 28 Nov 2011:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2011/11/28/mb-youth-christ-massage-parlour-bliss-manitoba.html
Massage centre OK'd by Winnipeg city committee
Youth for Christ has lost a bid to stop a massage parlour from becoming a neighbour to its downtown Winnipeg youth drop-in centre.
The faith-based group, whose multi-million-dollar centre is about to open at the corner of Higgins Avenue and Main Street, claimed the parlour business would be more about offering clients pleasure than a massage.
Executive director John Courtney told a City Hall committee on Monday that he feared the business would become a brothel visited by unsavoury characters who could threaten children going to his youth centre.
But John MacKenzie, who wants to open Bliss Bodyworks in a strip mall beside the centre, insisted it would be a legitimate business that consisted of a boot camp exercise program, a martial arts centre and alternative massage centre.
There will be no sex trade, he said.
He added it's the city, not him, that classifies the business as a massage parlour โ inciting all of the unsavoury suggestions that go with the name.
MacKenzie told CBC News that he had already explained to the group that their view of the business was wrong.
The committee voted to let the massage parlour proceed with conditions: it will have restricted hours and MacKenzie must return to the committee in 18 months to prove that it is a reputable business.
At the same time, the committee agreed that its classifications might need to be reworked and recommended changes to some by-laws.
Opinion from Winnipeg Free Press, 28 Nov 2011:
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/editorials/rub-joints-also-need-a-place-134579698.html
Rub joints also need a place
A Christian drop-in centre at Main Street and Higgins Avenue is upset that a massage parlour has been granted civic approval to go into business in the same neighbourhood, reigniting an old debate about where these kinds of establishments should be allowed, if anywhere.
The rub parlour is not a threat to children or others -- far less so, in any event, than the seedy hotels on the north side of the CP Rail tracks or the nearby soup kitchens and detox centre -- and it has a legal right to set up shop.
But let's get something straight at the beginning. The City of Winnipeg licenses prostitution. It's no secret that massage parlours, which operate under a civic bylaw, are fronts for the sex trade.
The rules of operation for massage parlours the city sets go so far as to forbid sexual activity that they actually confirm that something naughty is being bought and sold.
No other business, for example, has licensing rules that forbid nudity, and sexual or nude entertainment, or that compels employees and "massagists" to wear "non-transparent garments (that) cover his or her body between the neck and no more than 10 cm above the top of the knee."
Even restaurants, where children go, allow or encourage their female waiters to wear sexually suggestive clothing. Strip clubs are allowed to erect sexually suggestive signage, but not massage parlours.
Legitimate massage therapists are not bound by any rules other than proof they graduated from a certified course of instruction, while those who work in massage parlours require criminal-record checks and a certificate of good character from a police review board.
The licence fee for rub parlours is about $4,200 -- the most expensive for any business -- which the city requires as compensation for the regular inspections the Winnipeg Police Service vice division conducts. It is the only business that is actually restricted to the downtown.
The city doesn't agree it licenses prostitution -- in fact, the licence prohibits it -- but almost every time someone tries to open a massage parlour, someone else complains about the underground sex trade. That's probably why there are only three licensed rub parlours today.
The Youth for Christ centre is appealing the city's decision to grant the massage parlour a conditional use permit, or zoning approval, which it needs before it can buy a licence.
But if a massage parlour can't open in that industrial/commercial neighbourhood, then where can it? The city has no basis for denying the zoning approval, but what it could do is amend the bylaw to allow the indoor sex trade to expand into other areas of the city.
There's no reason why these businesses could not be allowed in industrial parks or dense commercial zones. The city could even impose restrictions limiting their proximity to schools and playgrounds.
Massage parlours may not be everyone's favourite neighbour, but they are not illegal -- at least not until, or if, they are caught with their pants down -- and they actually provide safe havens for women who have decided they want to work in the sex industry.
Youth for Christ should withdraw its appeal, and the city should open other areas of the city so massage parlours are not limited to the downtown.