Children @ Massage Parlours!!!!!!!

[Froggies angel]

Children have no place in MP's. For those who say they do think like a parent. You leave you two year old (child or baby....the infant what you want) with your brother for an evening. He goes to get a massage. Leaves the kid with one of the girls at the door to watch. The cops come in and bust the place. They take your away because you left him/her with someone who obviously isn't responsible. You gonna argue that there's nothing wrong with what you happened or you gonna be upset for this person bringing your child there. It's like going to a strip club for a beer on a night when your wife's out and you're babysitting. I don't think she'd like that, the establishment wouldn't, Children's aid wouldn't. Who would??

And for those of you saying to define "wrong".........
Who the hell are you?
A lawyer??
We're not looking to prove innocent or guilty by playing with the words being said. Wrong means "not right" in this case.
ie. 2+2=5....that is wrong
ie. baby+MP=Good!...that to is wrong.

 

[Fishie<3]

The funny thing is... after all these rebuttals, none of you can even
define why it is "wrong". You all choose to give run-about answers.
Why? Because you really don't know, do you!?!


Think carefully... How can you really believe in something that you
can't explain?

"Self-Evident" you say?
"You really need to ask why it's wrong?" you ask?

Seriously, no more joking around. If it really is that obvious, why
can't any of you explain it without using more subjective reasoning?


Ok, now somebody said, "It's wrong because it's not right". Well
thanks for pointing that out my friend, but now you have explain
why it's "not right"



LOL, you know what, nevermind... forget I wrote this...
Your arguments are solely based on opinions that only carry merit
with ppl who will concur. Some of your statements remind me of
grade school, where the kids say, "It's true because my daddy
said so."



^__^ Cheers ^__^

 

[Palestinian]

although in one way i can say it wouldn't matter if the baby was there, because it wouldn't know anything on what was going on.
but i can see how the baby being there is upsetting.
i think the main thing is, the baby, is a person, under the age of 18.
if a 17 year old can't go in, why should the baby be allowed in.

 

[liney]

You guys may be jumping the gun. I agree it's no place for children and if a MPA brought their child to work it is definitely wrong. However I agree with tmsg007. It could have been a friend of a MPA showing off her new baby, and maybe just stopping by.

Either way it would of freaked me out!


Big Ben

 

[wesley g]

Bringing a child into a mp, regardless of its age is both morally and lawfully wrong.

A dancer I used to date had two children and just returned from holidays with them. She had to stop by the club she worked at before she went home. She took them both in with her and that really bothered me, even though it was just for a few minutes.

I have seen ladies in the business who have just "had" a child, take the child to their workplace so the other girls could have a chance to see the child. Again, its a nice thought but it is enough to get them charged. CAS has an agenda against women in the sex trade who have children.

 

[Khan]

Are you serious??????????
I was just there the other day, but I saw no babies... I didnt stay, I didnt like the MPA that greeted me and the other girl that I did see there, disappeared on me

You know what, I have been thinking about going back to see Alee...

This shit is just wrong and bad.... Does the owner know he has babies in his spa? I mean come on, this thread is going to get around, becasue its a pretty serious topic....
Is he ever going to address this issue, Im sure some of us want answers!

 

[kayreo]

I used to go to a spa on Wilson several years back. Oriental Mystique I think it was called. One day I went in and had a session with the usual girl I saw there. I could hear a child running up and down the hallway and she went out to check her a few times and put her in another room. It was her daughter who sounded to be about 4 or 5. That was the only time that happened in the times I went there and I stopped going there so I don't know if it was just a unique situation or the norm. It was not a good thing, very distracting and a bad situation for the child. I never actually saw the girl though.

 

[Zippy]

NAST...

 

[Mike S]

Dear AznDoinkiBoi

The issue here is not the correct usage of the word wrong as to delve to the point where we can justify pretty much anything we do!

You must be at a much higher intellectual level then the average Joe but what the hells your point...if it can't be explained then just keep doing it...if it just feels wrong that is not reason enough to disagree..WRONG is a word that helps people convey a point that I have no problem understanding..no problem..I do not need to wait for some #%$*@^$ gramatically correct explanation to see it is bad. Even though boinking with my wife may not be wrong ..to not take proper precautions to protect your child from seeing that... is wrong!!! Go back and read about STDS ..skin contact stupid..under 18 is illegal...l remember someone being shot at a MP...how many more do you need.. is three enough or do you need at least five to understand wrong

You wanna put yourself in harms way fine..but not a child because you are to lazy or cheap to do the not wrong thing and plead stupid and ignorance or better yet I am not ashamed of what I do or I am not hiding my child from anything I do they will learn sooner or later well sonny boy it is just not that complicated for them yet...ice cream..bicycles..getting brave to touch a toad..playing house

remember KISS keep it simple stupid...IT"S WRONG

and this goes to all of the idiots that see this as no big deal and use this as a way to justify or validate your actions through children that is wrong and pathetic to..do you need pathetic explaned too!!!

 

[Florida Girl]

lol, nice post my friend ^__^

Could you define "pathetic" for my decrepit mind pls


Oh, by the way you spelt my name wrong ^__^


Cheers!

 

[Tiffany Jade]

Because it is against the law I can accept. There was once laws forbidding blacks in many establishments etc. Doesn't make it "wrong" in my opinion just problematic. Sure, if I owned
the MP I would tell the girls not to bring any child to work for reasons other than morality. The dangers of MP's, come on!
More people were shot at McDonalds.
My point is that there are far more real things to get upset about. Perhaps for some this gives them some moral righteousness where they don't have to examin their own actions.

 

[Gumdrops &Lolipops]

If you're arguing the point that it is ethically wrong to bring babies
to massage parlors - I disagree. Babies do not have the mental
capacity to know where they are.


Whatever idiot!!! whether the child comprehends or not... as a parent you are the guardian of that child and to provide a safe, wholesome and happy atmosphere and place where a bunch of of guys are getting yanked is no place for a child. With your logic maybe being in the room is okay to..that is just plain out and out disgusting..a very pathetic mother indeed..but as we know there is plenty of those around

 

[elfreda]

Let me see if I can lay this thing to rest once and for all. Mgnt was not present during this incident, and if they had the baby wouldnt have been allowed anywhere near the spa. The ladies on shift should have known better and were told so very firmly. The mother does not work in the spa. She was told not to come back with or with the baby. This was a unfortunate mistake and will not be repeated. The mgnt would like to apoligize to Tony and the other members of the board if it has made them uncomfortable. They would also like to offer Tony a free massage if you will consider another visit


Baron

 

[Misty G]

Baron,

Is it safe to assume you are the owner of this 5 star all ages spa? If so, why would you not just come out and say so instead of speaking in third person like this. I'm not really sure if you are the actual owner of this spa, a friend of the owner or just some guy that was bored and decided to play the role of the owner of this spa. It would be great if you could answer these questions for me,thanks.

PS Just think of the bragging rights this baby has over all his fellow pre schoolers. This kid has been to a parlour before most high school guys ever have. Talk about getting a head start. Im sure the baby thanks you Baron aka spa owner? aka friend of the owner? aka bored kid just messing with us?

 

[Chloe J]

Sure it's no place for a child. I agree.
But,...were they loving. was the child
neglected?? These are questions that
should be asked. Better maybe to take
her with her then to leave her with the
alcoholic in-laws or parents who knows what her options were. I assume that we
are talking about an infant who's awareness only spans within its' immediate environment.
Perhaps your judgement is a bit harsh.
Is what goes on behind those doors that that terrible that the aura will permanently damage this child for life. I can think of a lot worse places of vocation for an infant. A cow chop shop for instance or a Maple Leafs hockey game. Exposing the child to violence of any nature has far more damaging effects.

 

[ConfusedArmyChick]

Rusty

First of all my intrest in this sap is none of your busness.
I dont make false clames, posts, or promises I cant keep.
and Im deffenitly not a kid.
And as for your comment on a baby having bragging rights. Thats just plain f#$%ed up and nothing to joke about, bringing a minor into a spa is not funny, give your head a shake! this has been taken very seriosly and will not be repeated

Baron

 

[KMA]

Thanks for the many and different points of view, guys.

One thing that I find very

 

[Parviz E]

Are you serious man..... dont justify this MPA's actions for bringing a child to the spa... whether she was loving or not, that baby should not have been there.

We are grown men here and we know what goes on at MP's. Germs and bacteria is just one tiny thing that this child may catch. If the place got busted, or robbed or god knows what!...

Not to mention the fact that IM THERE FOR A FANTASY!

If home was a worse place to leave the child, you think a MP is much better?
Bottom line is that there are no excuses for this little child to be in there. It's just wrong. The police wouldnt like it, and neither would children's aid. Its W R O N G!

And how does the AGE of the child change shit??? Just becasue it may not remember its ok? What the hell is that! I dont agree with your POST-REPLY... but I guess that's why these Review Boards are here... to voice our opinions! Im sorry but I just dont agree with you! I was there and I know what I saw and IT was not RIGHT.

 

[MissNobody]

You have to pass a test and have a license to drive a car. Too bad we don't have the same requirements to become a parent.

Although if bringing a baby with you gets you extra mileage.......

...........just joking of course.

 

[kisses&licks]

So I guess you guys would object if I brought my 4 year old brother with me the next time I go to IT. Herbert (my little brother) is gonna be pretty upset, he really wanted to meet Alexis. Oh well, maybe next year when he is 5 and more mature I might bring him.